Resource Mobilization Theory

The theory of resource mobilization emerged to address the dilemma of movement participation. It distinguishes three approaches to overcoming this dilemma. The classic theory was formulated by Anthony Oberschall in 1973. The theory is often criticized for assuming that resources and symbols are always available and therefore requiring little or no mobilization. This view, however, has a few strengths. The theory emphasizes the importance of organization, interests, and political context.

The theoretical framework of resource mobilization stresses the role of organizations in social movements. Such organizations organize social movements and mobilize resources and support to further their goals. Similarly, the theory of resource mobilization draws from the rational choice approach, which argues that the discontented must be defined, persuaded, and coordinated to achieve their goals. The theory also explains why movements are so successful in other contexts despite their low level of political sophistication.

This theory assumes that individuals are rational and possess the resources necessary for concerted action. This is contrary to common assumptions about social movements. Even though widespread discontent is important, it does not guarantee social movement. A social movement requires adequate resources and motivated people. Moreover, the theory emphasizes that there are two types of motivation: the moral and the psychological. Both of these are essential for a successful resource mobilization. So, it is crucial to understand both of these factors before analyzing resource mobilization and its implications for the concept of resource mobilization.

Theorists have also noted that resource mobilization is closely linked to the success of social movements. It suggests that resource mobilization reflects the importance of operations logic, which is similar to the logic of capitalism. The role of morality in resource mobilization is not just an academic debate, but a critical analysis of how social movements actually operate. This analysis of social movements can inform how we understand the emergence of social movements. Its implications for economics are vast.